Search this site
Ponder on This
"This universe of ours, what is it really? Here we are, centres of consciousness, surrounded by a buzzing confusion which we must try to understand. But we are of the selfsame stuff of the universe -- perhaps ultimately a cloud of energy interacting with other clouds of energy -- and on that account we are in the role more of participants than observers. We cannot distance ourselves from our ambient, hold it at arm's length for impartial scrutiny. This fact has been heavily underlined by modern physics since it sets limits to our knowledge. What we experience is not external reality per se but our interaction with it, so that in a very real sense we are constructing our universe from ourselves."
"Astrology is an art, rather than a science or a system of religious beliefs. But what, then, is art? The artist mediates between different dimensions of life. The images, sounds, words and forms which the artist utilises are languages which can communicate the meaningful patterns of levels of reality which would otherwise be incomprehensible or incommunicable to the rational mind. When we are affected by art, it is because the work speaks to us on many levels: intellectual, intuitive, emotional, visceral."
"People who dismiss astrology do so out of either ignorance or rationalism. Rationalists have their place, but their limited assumptions and methods must be kept out of the arts. Interpretation of poem, dream or person requires intuition and divination, not science."
Gifts and More:
A Bit of a Bio:
Astro Inquiry is published in Washington State -- beaming out from Vashon Island. When I was 14 years-old, I made the dogged effort to write to as many astrologers in California as I could, seeing which, if any would take me on as a student. I lucked out with my teachers Ivy Goldstein Jacobson and Margaret Latvala, and studied with them through my high school years. A year later I became a member of Llewellyn George’s Educational Astrology organization in Los Angeles. I helped write, edit and publish the group’s quarterly newsletters... continues
SCHEDULE WITH FREDERICK NOW
Categories
- 6 Month Forecast
- Aim
- Alchemy
- Astrology
- Astronomy
- Buddhism
- Cats
- Charlatan
- Christmas
- Classes
- Colin Wilson
- Con-artists
- Conartists
- Cosmix
- Creativity
- Depth Psychology
- Diamond Approach
- Dreams
- Ego
- Frederick Woodruff
- Full Moon Watch
- Gurdjieff
- Humor
- Idries Shah
- Impressions
- Interviews
- Kulture
- Lunation Cycle
- Meditation
- Meister Eckhart
- Memes
- Miracles
- Music
- Myth
- New Moon Watch
- News to Chew
- Nisargadatta
- Pagan
- Passages
- Podcast
- Poetry
- Prose
- Qabalah
- Quotes
- Relationships
- Revolution
- Rumi
- Saturn
- Seasons
- Sleep
- Sufi Wisdom
- Sun Signs
- Tarot
- Teacher/Student
- Time
- Truth
- Union
- Universe
- William Blake
- Zeitgeist
- Zombie Apocalypse
AstroInquiry Greatest Hits
Consultations
Why Astrologers Need to Study Wittgenstein
Paul Horwich, in a long NY Times essay wrote:
Wittgenstein isn’t a walk in the park, but he’s worth your effort because the more you study his philosophy — which was actually, in spots, more akin to mysticism — the more freedom you might gain as an astrologer.
Like the closet mystic Carl Jung, Wittgenstein knew how to couch his propositions to pass the scrutiny of his peers (well, except for his mentor Bertrand Russell who he drove to fury by disregarding traditional formulations of logic.)
And because of this sketchy dance, between chilly logic and the nimbus of mysticism, I find Wittgenstein to be the most satisfying of linguistic rebels. His mix of the effable with the ineffable mirrors in a direct way how human beings toil with making sense (or a muddle) of astrology. Read more